The equivalence of multi-axis spine systems: Recommended stiffness limits using a standardized testing protocol

dc.contributor.authorHolsgrove, Timothy P
dc.contributor.authorAmin, Dhara B
dc.contributor.authorPascual, Sonia Ramos
dc.contributor.authorDing, Boyin
dc.contributor.authorWelch, WIlliam C
dc.contributor.authorGheduzzi, Sabina
dc.contributor.authorMiles, Anthony W
dc.contributor.authorWinkelstein, Beth A
dc.contributor.authorCosti, John Jack
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-09T02:59:17Z
dc.date.available2018-04-09T02:59:17Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-17
dc.description© 2017 Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This author accepted manuscript is made available following 12 month embargo from date of publication (Sept 2017) in accordance with the publisher’s archiving policyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe complexity of multi-axis spine testing often makes it challenging to compare results from different studies. The aim of this work was to develop and implement a standardized testing protocol across three six-axis spine systems, compare them, and provide stiffness and phase angle limits against which other test systems can be compared. Standardized synthetic lumbar specimens (n = 5), comprising three springs embedded in polymer at each end, were tested on each system using pure moments in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Tests were performed using sine and triangle waves with an amplitude of 8 Nm, a frequency of 0.1 Hz, and with axial preloads of 0 and 500 N. The stiffness, phase angle, and R2 value of the moment against rotation in the principal axis were calculated at the center of each specimen. The tracking error was adopted as a measure of each test system to minimize non-principal loads, defined as the root mean squared difference between actual and target loads. All three test systems demonstrated similar stiffnesses, with small (<14%) but significant differences in 4 of 12 tests. More variability was observed in the phase angle between the principal axis moment and rotation, with significant differences in 10 of 12 tests. Stiffness and phase angle limits were calculated based on the 95% confidence intervals from all three systems. These recommendations can be used with the standard specimen and testing protocol by other research institutions to ensure equivalence of different spine systems, increasing the ability to compare in vitro spine studies.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHolsgrove, T. P., Amin, D. B., Pascual, S. R., Ding, B., Welch, W. C., Gheduzzi, S., … Costi, J. J. (2018). The equivalence of multi-axis spine systems: Recommended stiffness limits using a standardized testing protocol. Journal of Biomechanics, 70, 59–66. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.010en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.010en
dc.identifier.issn0021-9290
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2328/37888
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.oaire.license.condition.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rights.holderElsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectMulti-axisen_US
dc.subjectSix-axisen_US
dc.subjectSpine testingen_US
dc.subjectSpine simulatoren_US
dc.subjectTest machinesen_US
dc.subjectTest systemsen_US
dc.titleThe equivalence of multi-axis spine systems: Recommended stiffness limits using a standardized testing protocolen_US
dc.typeArticleen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Holsgrove_equivalence_AM2017.pdf
Size:
719.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Author version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.84 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: