The problem with Kappa

Thumbnail Image
Powers, David Martin
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Association for Computational Linguistics
Rights Holder
Copyright © Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012.
It is becoming clear that traditional evaluation measures used in Computational Linguistics (including Error Rates, Accuracy, Recall, Precision and F-measure) are of limited value for unbiased evaluation of systems, and are not meaningful for comparison of algorithms unless both the dataset and algorithm parameters are strictly controlled for skew (Prevalence and Bias). The use of techniques originally designed for other purposes, in particular Receiver Operating Characteristics Area Under Curve, plus variants of Kappa, have been proposed to fill the void. This paper aims to clear up some of the confusion relating to evaluation, by demonstrating that the usefulness of each evaluation method is highly dependent on the assumptions made about the distributions of the dataset and the underlying populations. The behaviour of a number of evaluation measures is compared under common assumptions. Deploying a system in a context which has the opposite skew from its validation set can be expected to approximately negate Fleiss Kappa and halve Cohen Kappa but leave Powers Kappa unchanged. For most performance evaluation purposes, the latter is thus most appropriate, whilst for comparison of behaviour, Matthews Correlation is recommended.
Computational linguistics
Powers, D.M.W., 2012. The problem of Kappa. In W. Daelemans (Ed.) Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Avignon, France. Association for Computational Linguistics, 345–355.