Using Explicit Case Formulation to Improve Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD

Thumbnail Image
Date
2018-04-18
Authors
Nixon, Reginald David
Bralo, Danielle
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Abstract
We investigated the utility of explicit case formulation (CF) within Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) for individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). An uncontrolled pre-posttreatment design was used. Participants attended 12–16 weekly sessions of CPT with explicit CF, where CF guided treatment length and treatment components. Treatment was completed by 19 of the 23 participants who started therapy. Results revealed significant reductions in PTSD and depression severity as well as unhelpful PTSD-related beliefs from pre- to posttreatment (ds between 1.10 – 1.92) and treatment gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Of the participants available at posttreatment for assessment, 69% (n = 11/16) met good end-state functioning for PTSD and 62% (n = 8/13) did so at follow-up. Finally, 72% (n = 13/18) of those interviewed at posttreatment no longer met criteria for PTSD and this was found for 93% of those assessed at follow-up (n = 14/15). Treatment, and CF in particular, was found to be acceptable by participants. Explicit case formulation did not interfere with positive outcomes of Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD. Further clinical implications and future directions for research are discussed.
Description
© 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This author accepted manuscript is made available following 24 month embargo from date of publication (April 2018) in accordance with the publisher’s archiving policy
Keywords
case conceptualization, cognitive processing therapy, CPT, PTSD
Citation
Nixon, R. D. V., & Bralo, D. (2019). Using Explicit Case Formulation to Improve Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD. Behavior Therapy, 50(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2018.04.003