Health Impact Assessment in New South Wales & Health in All Policies in South Australia: differences, similarities and connections

dc.contributor.authorDelany, Toni
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Carmel
dc.contributor.authorHarris, E
dc.contributor.authorBaum, Fran
dc.contributor.authorLawless, Angela Patricia
dc.contributor.authorWildgoose, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorHaigh, F
dc.contributor.authorMacDougall, Colin James
dc.contributor.authorBroderick, D
dc.contributor.authorKickbusch, I
dc.descriptionThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Policy decisions made within all sectors have the potential to influence population health and equity. Recognition of this provides impetus for the health sector to engage with other sectors to facilitate the development of policies that recognise, and aim to improve, population outcomes. This paper compares the approaches implemented to facilitate such engagement in two Australian jurisdictions. These are Health Impact Assessment (HIA) in New South Wales (NSW) and Health in All Policies (HiAP) in South Australia (SA). Methods: The comparisons presented in this paper emerged through collaborative activities between stakeholders in both jurisdictions, including critical reflection on HIA and HiAP practice, joint participation in a workshop, and the preparation of a discussion paper written to inform a conference plenary session. The plenary provided an opportunity for the incorporation of additional insights from policy practitioners and academics. Results: Comparison of the approaches indicates that their overall intent is similar. Differences exist, however, in the underpinning principles, technical processes and tactical strategies applied. These differences appear to stem mainly from the organisational positioning of the work in each state and the extent to which each approach is linked to government systems. Conclusions: The alignment of the HiAP approach with the systems of the SA Government increases the likelihood of influence within the policy cycle. However, the political priorities and sensitivities of the SA Government limit the scope of HiAP work. The implementation of the HIA approach from outside government in NSW means greater freedom to collaborate with a range of partners and to assess policy issues in any area, regardless of government priorities. However, the comparative distance of HIA from NSW Government systems may reduce the potential for impact on government policy. The diversity in the technical and tactical strategies that are applied within each approach provides insight into how the approaches have been tailored to suit the particular contexts in which they have been implemented. Keywords: Health in all policies, Health impact assessment, Healthy public policyen
dc.identifier.citationDelany et al. : Health Impact Assessment in New South Wales & Health in All Policies in South Australia: differences, similarities and connections. BMC Public Health 2014 14 :699.en
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen
dc.rights© 2014 Delany et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en
dc.rights.holderDelany et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en
dc.titleHealth Impact Assessment in New South Wales & Health in All Policies in South Australia: differences, similarities and connectionsen
local.contributor.authorOrcidLookupLawless, Angela Patricia:
local.contributor.authorOrcidLookupMacDougall, Colin James:
local.contributor.authorOrcidLookupBaum, Fran:
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
358.89 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format
Publisher Version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
2.73 KB
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission