How does fatty mouthfeel, saltiness or sweetness of diets contribute to dietary energy intake?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCox, David
dc.contributor.authorHendrie, Gillian Anne
dc.contributor.authorLease, Haidee J
dc.contributor.authorRebuli, Megan A
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Mary
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-05T05:06:50Z
dc.date.available2018-10-05T05:06:50Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-31
dc.description© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).en_US
dc.description.abstractAs “taste” is a primary driver of food choice, the objective of this study was to understand how the sensory properties of diets relate to energy intake (EI). A database of 720 frequently consumed foods, described by a trained panel for basic tastes (sweetness, saltiness) and fatty mouthfeel, was systematically applied to all foods reportedly consumed in 24hr recalls as part of the 2011–2012 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 12,153 adults and children). Food groups were classified according to the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating, and their contribution to total nutrient and sensory intake estimated. There were significant positive correlations between the nutrient and sensory properties of diets, for example, for adults, EI and fatty mouthfeel r = 0.740; EI and saltiness r = 0.623 and EI and sweetness r = 0.517 (all p < 0.01). Core foods (e.g. fruits, vegetables, grains, dairy) can provide similar sensory stimulation whilst being of lower energy content than discretionary foods (e.g. confectionary, snacks). Regression models in adults, controlling for age, sex and BMI, revealed that fatty mouthfeel (β = 0.492), saltiness (β = 0.161) and sweetness (β = 0.138) were significant predictors of EI, explaining 56% variance (p < 0.01). Similar results were found for children. Fatty mouthfeel was the primary driver of energy intake but such sensory stimulation can be derived from core (e.g. dairy foods), rather than discretionary foods, at lower energy content.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCox, D. N., Hendrie, G. A., Lease, H. J., Rebuli, M. A., & Barnes, M. (2018). How does fatty mouthfeel, saltiness or sweetness of diets contribute to dietary energy intake? Appetite, 131, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.039en_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.039en_US
dc.identifier.issn0195-6663
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2328/38382
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.oaire.license.condition.licenseCC-BY-NC-ND
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2018 The Authors.en_US
dc.rights.holderThe Authors.en_US
dc.subjectSensoryen_US
dc.subjectTasteen_US
dc.subjectSweeten_US
dc.subjectSweeten_US
dc.subjectFatty-mouthfeelen_US
dc.subjectDieten_US
dc.subjectEnergy intakeen_US
dc.subjectAdultsen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.titleHow does fatty mouthfeel, saltiness or sweetness of diets contribute to dietary energy intake?en_US
dc.typeArticleen
local.contributor.authorOrcidLookupBarnes, Mary: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7832-9151en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cox_How_P2018.pdf
Size:
466.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.84 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Nutrition and Dietetics - Collected Works
Flinders Open Access Research