An empirical comparison of the OPQoL-Brief, EQ-5D-3 L and ASCOT in a community dwelling population of older people

dc.contributor.authorKaambwa, Billingsley
dc.contributor.authorGill, Liz
dc.contributor.authorMcCaffrey, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorLanscar, E
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Ian D
dc.contributor.authorCrotty, Maria
dc.contributor.authorGray, Leonard C
dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, Julie
dc.description© 2015 Kaambwa et al. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: This study examined the relationships between a newly developed older person-specific non-preference-based quality of life (QoL) instrument (Older People's Quality of Life brief questionnaire (OPQoL-brief)) and two generic preference-based instruments (the EQ-5D-3L Level (EQ-5D-3 L) and the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) in a community-dwelling population of Australian older people receiving aged care services. METHODS: We formulated hypotheses about the convergent validity between the instruments (examined by Wilcoxon-Mann Whitney, Kruskal Wallis and Spearman's correlation tests) and levels of agreement (assessed using intra class correlation (ICC) and modified Bland-Altman plots based on normalized Z EQ-5D-3 L and ASCOT utilities and OPQoL-Brief summary scores). RESULTS: The utilities/summary scores for 87 participants (aged 65-93 years) were moderately but positively correlated. Moderate convergent validity was evident for a number of instrument dimensions with the strongest relationship (r = 0.57) between 'enjoy life' (OPQoL-Brief) and 'social contact' (ASCOT). The overall ICC was 0.54 and Bland-Altman scatter plots showed 3-6% of normalized Z-scores were outside the 95% limits of agreement suggesting moderate agreement between all three instruments (agreement highest between the OPQoL-Brief and the ASCOT). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the OPQoL-Brief, the ASCOT and the EQ-5D_3L are suitable for measuring quality of life outcomes in community-dwelling populations of older people. Given the different constructs underpinning these instruments, we recommend that choice of instrument should be guided by the context in which the instruments are being applied. Currently, the OPQoL-Brief is not suitable for use in cost-utility analyses as it is not preference-based. Given their different perspectives, we recommend that both the ASCOT and the EQ-5D are applied simultaneously to capture broader aspects of quality of life and health status within cost-utility analyses within the aged care sector. Future research directed towards the development of a new single preference-based instrument that incorporates both health status and broader aspects of quality of life within quality adjusted life year calculations for older people would be beneficialen
dc.identifier.citationKaambwa B, Gill L, McCaffrey N, Lancsar E, Cameron ID, Crotty M, Gray L, Ratcliffe J. An empirical comparison of the OPQoL-Brief, EQ-5D-3 L and ASCOT in a community dwelling population of older people. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2015 Sep 30;13:164. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0357-7.en
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden
dc.rightsCopyright © 2015 Kaambwa et al.en
dc.rights.holderKaambwa et al.en
dc.titleAn empirical comparison of the OPQoL-Brief, EQ-5D-3 L and ASCOT in a community dwelling population of older peopleen
local.contributor.authorOrcidLookupCrotty, Maria:
local.contributor.authorOrcidLookupMcCaffrey, Nicola:
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
724.65 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format
Published Version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
2.73 KB
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission