Pumpkin is “yucky”!: A prospective study of overt and covert restriction in the development of young children's food preferences

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2019-01-04
Authors
Boots, Samantha B
Tiggemann, Marika
Corsini, Nadia
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Rights
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd.
Rights Holder
Elsevier Ltd.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate maternal feeding strategies as prospective predictors of young children's food preferences. Participants were 106 mother – child dyads with data collected when children were aged 4 (Time 1) and then again at 6 years old (Time 2). Mothers completed an initial questionnaire at Time 1 which contained measures of restrictive and covert feeding strategies. Children were interviewed concerning their food preferences and had their height and weight measured at Time 1 and again two years later (Time 2). Longitudinal regression results showed that Time 1 parental restrictive feeding predicted decreased child-reported preferences for fruit and vegetables and increased preferences for salty food and sweets at Time 2. Conversely, Time 1 parental covert control predicted greater child-reported preferences for fruit and vegetables over time. The results provide longitudinal evidence of the negative impact of restrictive feeding, and of the positive impact of covert control, on the development of young children's food preferences.
Description
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This author accepted manuscript is made available following 24 month embargo from date of publication (January 2019) in accordance with the publisher’s archiving policy
Keywords
maternal feeding strategies, food preferences, Children's food preferences, Childhood obesity
Citation
Boots, S. B., Tiggemann, M., & Corsini, N. (2019). Pumpkin is “yucky”!: A prospective study of overt and covert restriction in the development of young children’s food preferences. Appetite, 135, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.appet.2018.12.035