Philoponus's traversal argument and the beginning of time

dc.contributor.author Couvalis, Spyridon George
dc.date.accessioned 2013-07-25T07:14:53Z
dc.date.available 2013-07-25T07:14:53Z
dc.date.issued 2013-07
dc.description.abstract Richard Sorabji has argued that John Philoponus’ arguments for the claim that time must have had a beginning are good ad hominem arguments against Aristotle. However, he claims that they do not show that time must have had a beginning. I argue that one of those arguments, the traversal argument, is unaffected by Sorabji’s major criticisms. Sorabji fails to take account of the fact that the argument is not merely based on logical considerations, but on a theory of time. en
dc.description.note This paper was originally presented at the Ninth Biennial International Conference of Greek Studies, Flinders University, June 2011. en
dc.identifier.citation Couvalis, G., 2013. Philoponus's traversal argument and the beginning of time. Journal of Modern Greek Studies - Special Issue, 68-78. en
dc.identifier.issn 1039-2831
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2328/26843
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Modern Greek Studies Association of Australia and New Zealand (MGSAANZ) en
dc.rights All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. en
dc.rights.holder Modern Greek Studies Association of Australia and New Zealand en
dc.subject Greece en
dc.subject Greek research en
dc.subject Australia en
dc.title Philoponus's traversal argument and the beginning of time en
dc.type Article en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Philoponus's Traversal.pdf
Size:
990.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.73 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: